Given a theorem-tactic ttac, a theorem th whose conclusion is a
conjunction, a disjunction or an existentially quantified term, and a goal
(A,t), STRIP_THM_THEN ttac th first strips apart the conclusion of th,
next applies ttac to the theorem(s) resulting from the stripping and then
applies the resulting tactic to the goal.
In particular, when stripping a conjunctive theorem A'|- u /\ v, the tactic
ttac(u|-u) THEN ttac(v|-v)
resulting from applying ttac to the conjuncts, is applied to the
goal. When stripping a disjunctive theorem A'|- u \/ v, the tactics
resulting from applying ttac to the disjuncts, are applied to split the goal
into two cases. That is, if
A ?- t A ?- t
========= ttac (u|-u) and ========= ttac (v|-v)
A ?- t1 A ?- t2
then:
A ?- t
================== STRIP_THM_THEN ttac (A'|- u \/ v)
A ?- t1 A ?- t2
When stripping an existentially quantified theorem A'|- ?x.u, the
tactic ttac(u|-u), resulting from applying ttac to the body of the
existential quantification, is applied to the goal. That is, if:
A ?- t
========= ttac (u|-u)
A ?- t1
then:
A ?- t
============= STRIP_THM_THEN ttac (A'|- ?x. u)
A ?- t1
The assumptions of the theorem being split are not added to the assumptions of
the goal(s) but are recorded in the proof. If A' is not a subset of the
assumptions A of the goal (up to alpha-conversion), STRIP_THM_THEN ttac th
results in an invalid tactic.